If a code official disapproves a material, what is required for communication of this decision?

When a code official disapproves a material, it is essential to provide a written response stating the reason for the disapproval. This written documentation serves multiple purposes: it provides a clear and formal explanation to the party involved, ensures accountability on the part of the code official, and maintains a record of the decision-making process. Written communication helps prevent misunderstandings and enables the manufacturer or contractor to address the specific concerns raised regarding the material. It is also a crucial step in the processes of appeal or re-evaluation should the party wish to contest or seek further clarification on the ruling.

Other options may suggest methods of communication that are less formal or lacking in specificity. Verbal notice, while immediate, does not provide a reliable record for future reference. Public announcements can create confusion or misinformation, especially if not all stakeholders are aware of them. A review committee's approval is not necessary in the initial decision-making process regarding the disapproval of materials, as a singular code official is typically responsible for this determination.